Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:3205 WP No. 416 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 416 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT MALA N W/O SUDHINDRA THEERTA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS #07 GIDADHA KONENAHALLI VILLAGE SY.NO 48 NISARGA LAYOUT, BANGALORE 560091
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. PHANIRAJ KASHYAP., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, NR SQURE, BANGALORE -560002.
2.
THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BBMP HARIHALLI SUB-DIVISION (WARD NO.28) BANGALORE 560064
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR., ADVOCATE)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ORDER DATED. 07.12.2023 PASSED IN APPEAL NO. 167/2024 BY R-1 VIDE ANNEXURE-A, ETC.
Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:3205 WP No. 416 of 2025
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER
1. The learned counsel for the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike ('BBMP') submits that the petitioner had wrongly submitted the plan to the Executive Engineer, whereas it ought to have been submitted to the Assistant Director, Town Planning Department.
2. He also submits that the Assistant Executive Engineer would in turn forward the said application to the Assistant Director of Town Planning Department and the Assistant Director will thereafter consider the same in accordance with law.
3. In light of the above, until the consideration of the plan submitted by the petitioner for approving the
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:3205 WP No. 416 of 2025
building that he has constructed, the impugned order shall be kept in abeyance.
4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE
RK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 69