MANTURA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND 8 OTHERS
CRLP/2645/2025 · 2025-04-02
Brij Raj Singh, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131028 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131028 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18357-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2645 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mantura Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Pandey,Saumya Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Ankit Srivastava Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. Sri Kumar Jaikrit, Advocate has appeared on behalf of State Bank of India/opposite party no.5 and filed Power, the same is taken on record. This petition seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party nos. 2 to 4 not to harass the petitioner in any manner.
Learned counsel for the State Bank of India submits that the account of the petitioner is operational and that there is no hold or freeze in the account. The petitioner can come to the Bank and operate her account. At this state, learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is consigned to record as withdrawn. (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary,J.)
Order Date :- 2.4.2025 Arjun/- Digitally signed by :- ARJUN PRASAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ARJUN PRASAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench