Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 131027 (ALL)

MONU @ PRASHANT VERMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/2630/2025 · 2025-04-10

Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, Vivek Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20325-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2630 of 2025 Petitioner :- Monu @ Prashant Verma And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailender Singh,Ankit Tiwari,Neelam Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Varun Kumar Mishra Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Varun Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for opposite party no.3. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought quashing of the First Information Report dated 31.12.2024 bearing Case Crime No.0733 of 2024, under Sections 115(2), 191(2), 324(4) of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Para, District Lucknow. 3. On 1.4.2025, parties were directed to appear before the Senior Registrar for verification of compromise. 4. The report of the Senior Registrar of this Court dated 4.4.2025 is on record, according to which, he has verified the compromise on 4.4.2025. The original compromise is on record which has been annexed as Annexure-2 to the writ petition. 5. According to the terms of the compromise, parties have decided to withdraw all the cases filed by them against each other including First Information Report dated 31.12.2024 bearing Case Crime No.0733 of 2024, under Sections 115(2), 191(2), 324(4) of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Para, District Lucknow. 6. Learned counsel for the parties state that the money under the said compromise is already paid/settled between the parties. 7. Intent is clear, the informant-Abhishek Patel, who is a signatory to the compromise, does not want to press the FIR, therefore, no purpose would be served in allowing the proceedings even if charge sheet has been filed before the court below to go on considering the nature of the dispute. 8. Accordingly, the impugned FIR, which is the basis to serve consequential proceedings of investigation and thereafter filing of charge sheet, if any, is hereby quashed. Consequently, all proceedings taken consequent to the lodging of the FIR including charge sheet, if any, filed before the court below stand quashed. 9. The writ petition is, accordingly, allowed. 10. The Senior Registrar of this Court shall communicate this order to the court concerned for correcting its record, accordingly. 11. Learned AGA shall communicate this order to the investigating officer. . [Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 10.4.2025 Sachin Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench