Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1310 (UTT)

AVTAR SINGH CHAUHAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

CRLR/338/2013 · 2025-02-11

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS CRLR No.338 of 2013 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Pratool Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate for the revisionist. 2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, B.H. for the State. 3. Today the matter is listed on Delay Condonation Application (CRMA No.1933 of 2013). 4. There is a delay of 1414 days in filing the criminal revision. 5. Having gone through the delay condonation application and the affidavit filed in support thereof, this Court does not find any sufficient ground to condone the delay. The delay condonation application is rejected. 6. Accordingly, the criminal revision is dismissed on ground of delay. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 11.02.2025 SK