Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1310 (AP)

GOTHINA DINESH v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/25543/2025 · 2026-04-07

D Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010486122025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 25543/2025 Between: 1. GOTHINA DINESH, S/O.LATE GOTHINA RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O. 16-2/2, PANDRANGAPURAM, ARILOVA, VISAKAPATANAM CITY VISAKAPATANAM ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE ANDHRA UNIVERISTY, REP BY ITS VICE CHANCELLOR, ADMINISTATIVE BUILDINGS, ANDHRA UNIVERSITY, VISAKAPATANAM. 3. THE REGISTRAR, ANDHRA UNIVERSITY, VISAKAPATANAM. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ANAND KUMAR KOCHIRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR SERVICES II 2. GANGA KUMAR CHAKRAVARTULA The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.25543 of 2025 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed declaring the action of the respondents, particularly respondent No.3, in not considering the representation made by the petitioner on 12.07.2025 and not releasing the family pension and other benefits of the deceased mother of the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader appearing for respondent No.1 and learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3. 3. The fact remains that the employee has already died. In the said circumstances, the petitioner, being the legal heir, made a request/representation to the respondents. The respondent authorities have to take a decision as per rules and communicate the same to the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents, more particularly respondent No.3, to consider the representation made by the petitioner on 12.07.2025 and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of two 4 (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date: 08.04.2026 Ivd 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.25543 of 2025 Dated: 08.04.2026 Ivd