Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 130974 (ALL)

CHANDRA PRAKASH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/1791/2025 · 2025-04-02

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18180 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1791 of 2025 Petitioner :- Chandra Prakash Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bisunbablu Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "Wherefore it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the opposite party no. 2 to decide Revision No. 1685 of 2016, Computerized Case No. R20161058001685 (Sudhir Kumar and others Versus Chandra Prakash and others) at an early date or as per order of this Hon'ble court, within a stipulated period, which this Hon'ble court thinks fit and proper, enabling the petitioner to get justice during his life time, to secure the ends of justice." Taking note of Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, as per which, revision or appeal should preferably be decided preferably within six months, however, in the instant case, the revision is pending since 2016 and on account of pendency of the same, the petitioner, as stated, who is aged about 75 years, is suffering great hardship and mental agony, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2/Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow to consider and decide the Revision No.1685 of 2016, Computerized Case No. R20161058001685 (Sudhir Kumar and others Versus Chandra Prakash and others) most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 2.4.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench