KIRTI BALLABH NAINWAL AND ORS v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION , ACB
CRLR/864/2024 · 2025-07-15
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13097 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13097 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
CRLR No.864 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Piyush Sammal, Advocate for the revisionists.
2. Mr. Piyush Garg, Advocate for the respondent-CBI.
3. From perusal of the record, it transpires that the revisionists have challenged the summoning order dated 18.10.2024 passed by the court of Special Judicial Magistrate-CBI/Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Dehradun in Criminal Case No.1290 of 2022, CBI vs. Devendra Singh Yadav and others. Against the said summoning order, the revisionist has a remedy to file a revision before the Sessions Judge, therefore, this revision appears to be misconceived.
4. To this query, learned counsel for the revisionists made a request to withdraw the present criminal revision with liberty to seek appropriate remedy before the appropriate court of law.
5. His request is acceded.
6. The present criminal revision is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
15.07.2025 Ravi