Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13094 (ALL)

M/S CHAUHAN BHATTA UDHYOG v. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

WRIC/62306/2012 · 2025-10-07

Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 62306 of 2012 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 22.08.2025, notice was issued to the petitioner to engage another counsel. As per office report dated 17.09.2025, the notice has been served upon the petitioner, but neither any vakalatnama nor anyone has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, service of notice upon petitioner is deemed sufficient. It appears that by the efflux of time, the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the case. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. October 8, 2025 Sattyarth Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : J.J. Munir Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I.(2012/5704) (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) M/S Chauhan Bhatta Udhyog .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad