W.P.(MD)No.8973 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.04.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND W.P.(MD)No.8973 of 2025 J.Jeyaseelan David ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Agricultural Production Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Government, Department of Agriculture, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Director of Agriculture, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent i.e.,the Agricultural Production Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Government, Chennai to pass appropriate orders on the disciplinary action initiated against the petitioner by the Director of Agriculture, Chennai in his memo No.gxe. 1/3/148785/2019 dated 06.08.2020 within a specified time frame that may be fixed by this Court. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.8973 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.S.Visvalingam For Respondent : Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to pass appropriate orders on the disciplinary action initiated against the petitioner by the Director of Agriculture, Chennai, dated 06.08.2020 within a time frame fixed by this Court. 2. While the petitioner is working as Assistant Director of Agriculture, the disciplinary action was initiated against him by the second respondent. The charge memo was issued and an enquiry officer was appointed. After completion of enquiry, the enquiry officer submitted his report on 01.03.2023 and thereafter, the second respondent is not concluding disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner in the year 2020. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in my considered view, keeping this writ petition for years together is not useful to anybody. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.8973 of 2025 4. In view of the same, this Court intends to dispose of this writ petition at the admission stage with the consent of both parties without going into the merits of the case with a direction to the second respondent to conclude the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner within a time to be stipulated herein under to meet the ends of justice. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to conclude the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner by following due process of law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 02.04.2025 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no Sn 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.8973 of 2025 To: 1.The Agricultural Production Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Government, Department of Agriculture, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Director of Agriculture, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.8973 of 2025 BATTU DEVANAND , J. Sn W.P.(MD)No.8973 of 2025 02.04.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis