MOHAMMAD ABDULLAH JAHRA v. MR. VIJAY KUMAR BIDHURI ORS. (REVENUE DEPARTMENT) (SWP/2027/2015)
CCP(S)/240/2022 · 2025-03-07
Mohd Yousuf Wani
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13091 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13091 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 36 Regular List HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) No. 240/2022 Mohammad Abdullah Jahra …Petitioner(s) Through: None Vs Mr. Vijay Kumar Bidhuri and Ors. …Respondent(s) Through: None CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE MOHD YOUSUF WANI, JUDGE
O R D E R 07.03.2025
01. There is no representation on part of the petitioner. Same was the position on the last two consecutive hearings of the case.
02. The instant contempt petition appears to have been filed for the alleged breach of interim order dated 30th September, 2015 passed on the main petition, which is reported to have been transferred to the Central Admisntrative Tribunal, vide Order dated 14th August, 2020. It appears that petitioner is no more interested in the prosecution of this contempt petition, which is accordingly closed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to seek its revival or to file a fresh one, if needed.
(MOHD YOUSUF WANI)
JUDGE SRINAGAR 07.03.2025 Shamim Dar