Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13090 (BOM)

VITHALDAS DHONDIRAM KABRA DIED THR LRS KAUSHALYABAI KABRA DIED THR LRS WALCHAND KABRA AND ORS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ORS.

CA/4364/2025 · 2025-04-17

Shri Shailesh P Brahme

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 942.CA.4364-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4364 OF 2025 IN FA/591/1992 VITHALDAS DHONDIRAM KABRA DIED THR LRS KAUSHALYABAI KABRA DIED THR LRS WALCHAND KABRA AND ORS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ORS. ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Rathi Swapnil S. AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. S.M. Ganachari … CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 17th APRIL 2025 PER COURT : . Applicants are seeking direction for disbursement of 1/6 share each from the amount which is lying in the High Court. 2. The present Applicants along with Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 had preferred First Appeal No.591/1992. It was disposed of by common judgment and order dated 09.06.2009. Amount deposited by the acquiring body in High Court remained to be disbursed. Applicants and Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are entitled to receive the amount equally. Its matter of record that Applicant No.1 – Kaushalyabai died and she is survived by Applicant Nos. 2 to 5 and Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. As Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are not available for the signature for filing application, they are impleaded as Respondents. Applicants are entitled to 1/6 share each by keeping 2025:BHC-AUG:11381 2 942.CA.4364-2025.doc the shares of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in time. 3. Learned AGP does not have any serious objection. 4. The Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’. 5. It is clarified that if the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 approached this office, they be disbursed the balance amount. SHAILESH P. BRAHME JUDGE NAJEEB..