Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13090 (AP)

The Divisional Forest Officer, v. N.Govindarajulu,

WP/6788/2019 · 2025-03-18

A Hari Haranadha Sarma, B Krishna Mohan

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010156572019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3527] TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT PETITION NO: 6788/2019 Between: The Divisional Forest Officer, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND N Govindarajulu and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): GP FOR SERVICES I (AP) Counsel for the Respondent(S): P V RAMANA The Court made the following Order: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B.Krishna Mohan) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Both the learned counsels submit that this matter is squarely covered by the order passed by the erstwhile Tribunal in O.A.No.7915 of 2002 dated 26.08.2002, O.A.No.7335 of 2010 dated 27.10.2010, O.A.No.8128 of 2011 and batch dated 29.09.2011 and when on some of these orders the 2 Government carried S.L.P. before the Hon’ble Apex Court the same were dismissed in S.L.P.No.7957 of 2007 and S.L.P.(C) No.10049 of 2007 dated 23.11.2009. In terms of the above said orders passed by the Apex Court in the above said S.L.P. this O.A. was also allowed by the erstwhile Tribunal dated 05.11.2013 which reads as under: “3. The subject matter of this O.A. is covered by the orders passed by the Tribunal in O.A. 6979/2013 dated 27.09.2013. Therefore, following the orders passed in O.A. 6979/2013, dated 27.92013, this O.A. is also allowed directing the respondents to grant H.R.A. and annual grade increments etc., to the applicants as was sanctioned to the persons similarly situated in the time scale wherein their pay was fixed and also to pay the arrears. The respondents are further directed to extend the benefit to further pay revision made from time to time. Necessary orders in this regard shall be passed by the respondents within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.” 3. In view of the same, as there are no grounds to interfere in this writ petition, the same is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B.KRISHNA MOHAN __________________________________ JUSTICE A.HARI HARANADHA SARMA 18.03.2025 NNN