Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 130867 (ALL)

SMT.VANDANA RATHAUR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/3048/2025 · 2025-04-01

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18073-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3048 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt.Vandana Rathaur Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue U.P. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Apoorv Srivastava,Aakash Srivastava,Sunil Mohan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sarvesh Kumar Dubey Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Manish Mishra, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. The petitioner claims that her land has been acquired for the National Highway Authority of India. The petitioner has admittedly purchased portion of the Gata No. 1027 after the award/order passed by the competent authority on 12.04.2022 under Section 3-G (1), therefore, in view of the Full Bench decision rendered on 05.09.2022 in Writ- C No. 30608 of 2018; Sursati Vs. State of U.P. the petitioner will have to avail the remedies as against the vendor unless the money deposited by NHAI has not been disbursed to the vendor and the vendor is not claiming the same in which case the petitioner may approach the competent authority who may consider the application of the petitioner as per law. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 1.4.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench