Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18545 Court No. - 14 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2761 of 2025 Applicant :- Thekedar Chaman Raj @ Chaman Raj And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Principal Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Narvind Kumar Singh,Preeti Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. 1. Heard Shri Narvind Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./528 B.N.S.S. has been filed for the following main relief:- " अततः ममानननीय न्यमायमालय ससे पमाररनमा हहै यमाचनीगण कसे वविरूद्ध पचललत सम्पपूणर कमायरविमाहनी ससेशन विमाद ससंख्यमा- 3637/2023 अन्तगरत धमारमा- 323, 504, 506 भमा०द०ससं० वि 3 (1) द, 3 (1) ध अननुसपूवचत जमावत एविसं अननुसपूवचत जनजमावत (ननृशसंसतमा वनविमारण) अलधवनयम, रमानमा- कमाककोरनी, लजलमा- लखनऊ, सरकमार- बनमाम- ठसेकसे दमार चमन रमाज आवद जको वक अपरमाध ससंख्यमा-0261/2021, अन्तगरत धमारमा- 323, 504, 506 भमा०द०ववि० वि 3 (1) द, 3 (1) ध अननुसपूवचत जमावत एविसं अननुसपूवचत जनजमावत (ननृशसंसतमा वनविमारण) अलधवनयम, कक पनुललस दमारमा पसेवषित आरकोप -पत्र सख्यमा -01 वदनमासंवकत 15.06.2021, पर न्यमायमालय शनीममान वविशसेषि न्यमायमाधनीश (एस०सनी०/एस०टनी०) ऐक्ट लखनऊ कसे समक्ष पचललत ससेशन विमाद ससंख्यमा- 3637/2023 कक सम्पपूणर कमायरविमाहनी सममाप्त करनसे कक कनृ पमा करर। यहमाहाँ यह भनी पमाररनमा हहै वक यमाचनीगण कसे वविरूद्ध पचललत सम्पपूणर कमायरविमाहनी ससेशन विमाद ससंख्यमा- 3637/2023 अन्तगरत धमारमा- 323, 504, 506 भमा०द०ससं० वि 3 (1) द, 3 (1) घ अननुसपूवचत जमावत एविसं अननुसपूवचत जनजमावत (ननृशसंसतमा वनविमारण ) अलधवनयम, रमानमा- कमाककोरनी, लजलमा- लखनऊ, सरकमार- बनमाम- ठसेकसे दमार चमन रमाज आवद जको वक जको न्यमायमालय शनीममान वविशसेषि न्यमायमाधनीश (एस०सनी०/एस०टनी०) ऐक्ट लखनऊ, वविचमारमाधनीन हहै, कक कमायरविमाहनी स्रवगत वकयसे जमानसे कमा आदसेश पमाररत करनसे कक कनृ पमा करर।" 3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicants to file bail application before the trial court which may be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351: (2022) 10 SCC 51 as also to prefer a discharge application before the court below and the same may be decided expeditiously. 4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. 5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicants apply for bail before the Court concerned, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. 6. Liberty is also granted to the applicants to move discharge application before the court below and the same shall be decided expeditiously in accordance with law. 7. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observation made in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the applicants apply for bail, whichever is earlier, he would not take any coercive action against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 8. With the aforesaid observations, the present application is disposed of. Order Date :- 3.4.2025 Mohd. Sharif Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench