SHAKEEL AHMAD v. UOI THRU. ITS SECY. MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION NEW DELHI AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/3349/2025 · 2025-04-02
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130844 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130844 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18199 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3349 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shakeel Ahmad Respondent :- Uoi Thru. Its Secy. Ministry Of Communication New Delhi And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deo Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Rajneesh Mishra Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Anand Dwivedi, learned Counsel for Union of India and Shri Dwijendra Mishra, learned Counsel for the opposite parties no.2 and 3.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that gratuity as well as provident fund has not been paid though the petitioner has retired way back on 31.05.2024.
3. Nevertheless, considering the nature of grievance, the petition is disposed of with the direction to the opposite party no.3 to look into the matter, verify the facts and take a decision as regards payment of gratuity as well as provident fund to the petitioner within two months from the date a copy of this order is submitted. Needless to say that if any interest is payable on the said amount, the same shall also be paid as per rules. Order Date :- 2.4.2025 Anupam S/- Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench