HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2174 of 2023 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. Heard Sri Ronak Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rahul Srivastava, learned counsel for the C.B.I. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in RC No.1202021A0007, under Sections 120-B and 420 IPC in Special Case No.5 of 2023 (CBI Vs. M/s Vardhman Roller Flour Mills Private Limited), Police Station ACB, Ghaziabad, with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that during the pendency of the instant anticipatory bail application in Criminal Revision No.4503 of 2025 (Anil Kumar Jain Vs. C.B.I. And Another) this Court has stayed the further proceedings pending against the applicant vide order dated 19.08.2025 therefore, applicant is having no apprehension of his arrest, therefore, instant anticipatory bail application may be dismissed as infructuous at this stage with liberty to the applicant if in future cause of action will again arise then he may file second anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the C.B.I. is having no objection. 5. Considering the fact that during the pendency of the instant anticipatory bail application, further proceedings pending against the applicant has been stayed by this Court vide order dated 19.08.2025 passed in Criminal Revision No.4503 of 2025 therefore, it appears, at present applicant is having no apprehension of his arrest, therefore, instant anticipatory bail application stands dismissed with liberty as prayed for. September 25, 2025 Zafar Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ronak Chaturvedi, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Rahul Srivastava, Sanjay Kumar Yadav (Sameer Jain,J.) Anil Kumar Jain .....Applicant(s) C.B.I. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ZAFAR ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad