SHADAB HAIDER ADVOCATE v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT CIVIL SECTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS
WPIL/286/2025 · 2025-04-03
Attau Rahman Masoodi, Karunesh Singh Pawar
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130813 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130813 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18534-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 286 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shadab Haider Advocate Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Urban Development Civil Sectt. Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arun Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Namit Sharma,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
1. Vakalatnamas filed on behalf of the Lucknow Development Authority and Nagar Nigam, Lucknow by Sri Anadh Shukla and Sri Sankalp Dewari learned counsel respectively are taken on record.
2. From the photographs placed on record, it cannot be deciphered that the park situated in the locality requires construction of a boundary wall which has already been constructed from all the sides.
3. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have however stated that in case there is any damage caused to the boundary wall at any place, the same shall be looked into by the Lucknow Development Authority/Nagar Nigam, Lucknow and necessary repairs shall be carried out at the earliest.
4. In view of the statements made, the writ petion is finally disposed of with the hope and trust that the local authorities shall take due measures for maintaining the park and repair of the boundary required, if any, shall be carried out. . [Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.] [Attau Rahman Masoodi, J.]
Order Date :- 3.4.2025/kanhaiya Digitally signed by :- KANHAIYA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench