RAM KUMAR RAJAK @ RAM KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/1729/2025 · 2025-04-01
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130802 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130802 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17872 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1729 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Kumar Rajak @ Ram Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akash Deep Singh,Abhishek Tripathi,Ankit Singh,Anurag Sing,Rudresh Pandey,Suneel Kumar Tiwari,Taranpreet Kaur Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard Sri Akash Deep Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. and perused the records. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The present petition has been filed for the following main reliefs:-
"A Suitable direction commanding the opposite party no.3/Tehsil Lambhua, District-Sultanpur to decide the case no. 454/2025, Computerized case no. T202504680300454, Ram kumar and others versus Vijay Pal and others U/S-24 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, pending before him expeditiously, within the specific time frame as coded in the provisions or court may deem fit just and proper." Submission of learned Counsel for the petitioner is to the effect that the proceedings instituted under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, should be decided in the light of provisions of U.P. Revenue Code 2006 read with U.P. Revenue Code Rules 2016 particularly Sub Section 2 and 3 of Section 24 and Rule 22(10) of Rules of 2016 and in the instant case the proceedings is pending since 2022. Accordingly, indulgence of this Court is required. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping this petition pending. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 3, to consider and decide the Case No. 454/2025, Computerized case no. T202504680300454, Ram kumar and others versus Vijay Pal and others, as per law, most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of three months from the next date fixed in the case, if possible and if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 1.4.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench