KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD v. UNION OF INDIA
WP/2318/2017 · 2025-02-17
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13080 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13080 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:6973 WP No. 2318 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 2318 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, 4TH & 5TH FLOOR, EAST WING, KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA - 560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMASHEKAR., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.B.PATIL., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF POWER, SHRAM SHAKTI BHAWAN, RAFI MARG, NEW DELHI - 110 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY.
2.
POWERGRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD., B-9, QUTAB INSTITUTIONAL AREA, KATWARIA SARAI, NEW DELHI - 110 016.
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR.
3.
M/S POWERGRID NM TRANSMISSION LTD., B-9, QUTAB INSTITUTIONAL AREA, KATWARIA SARAI, NEW DELHI - 110 016.
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR.
4.
M/S. POWERGRID NM TRANSMISSION LTD., 765KV S/C DHARMAPURI - MADHUGIRI LINE,
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:6973 WP No. 2318 of 2017
CONSTRUCTION OFFICE, POWERGRID 400/220KV, SUBSTATION, 26TH KM-KANAKAPURA ROAD, SOMANAHALLI P.O., BENGALURU - 560 082.
KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER.
5.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHANTHI BHUSHAN.H., DSGI FOR R1 TO 4;
SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R5)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Somashekar., counsel on behalf of Sri.B.B.Patil., for the petitioner has appeared in person. Counsel submits that a memo has been filed and the same may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:6973 WP No. 2318 of 2017
In view of the memo the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 16