Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 130796 (MAD)

S.Ilamurugu v. The Superintendent of Police

WP(MD)/8981/2025 · 2025-04-02

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No.8981 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.04.2025 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL W.P(MD)No.8981 of 2025 S.Ilamurugu ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. 3. The Inspector of Police, Ilaiyangudi Police Station, Sivagangai District. 4. G.Kathirvel 5. Jeya ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing to the Respondents No. 2 and 3 herein to provide necessary Police Protection to the Petitioner's life, limb and construct his house in Survey No. 57/4A situated at Virayathakandan village, Ilaiyangudi Taluk, Sivagangai District. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.8981 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.C.Mayil Vahana Rajendran For Respondents : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi (R1-R3) Additional Public Prosecutor O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents No. 2 and 3 to provide necessary police protection to the petitioner's life, limb and construct his house in Survey No. 57/4A situated at Virayathakandan village, Ilaiyangudi Taluk, Sivagangai District. 2.According to the petitioner, he is the owner of the property in Survey No. 57/4A at Virayathakandan village, Ilaiyangudi Taluk, Sivagangai District. While so, after surveying the property, when he tried to construct a house in the said property, the private respondents caused obstruction. Therefore, he sent a representation to the respondent police, but the same has not been considered. Hence, this petition. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police would submit that they have received the representation of the petitioner and since the dispute is pertains to immovable property, the enquiry is pending with the 2nd respondent. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.8981 of 2025 However, they will conduct enquiry and dispose the same within a period of 15 days. 4.Considering the prayer of the petitioner, this Court is inclined to dispose of the writ petition without issuing notice to the private respondents. 5.Since the representation of the petitioner is pending with the respondent police, it is appropriate to direct the 2nd respondent to conduct enquiry based on the representation of the petitioner and dispose the same in accordance with law. 6.In view of the same, this Court hereby directs the 2nd respondent to conduct enquiry based on the representation of the petitioner and dispose the same within a period of 15 days from the date of this order, after affording opportunities to both parties in accordance with law. 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.8981 of 2025 7.With the above observations and directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. 02.04.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No PNM To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. 3. The Inspector of Police, Ilaiyangudi Police Station, Sivagangai District. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.8981 of 2025 P.DHANABAL , J. PNM ORDER IN W.P(MD)No.8981 of 2025 02.04.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis