[2025:RJ-JP:17634] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2823/2025 Kamlesh Kumar S/o Shri Kaluram, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Dhani Kharli, Village Thikariya, Police Station Nangal Rajawatarn, District Dausa. (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Jail At Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Ashok Kumar S/o Shri Kishan Lal, R/o Barwal Ki Dhani, Nangal Rajawatan, District Dausa. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4265/2025 Mukesh Kumar S/o Baluram Meena, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Dhani Kharli, Thikariya, P.s Nangal Rajavtan, District Dausa (Rajasthan) (Accused Presently Behind The Bar In Dausa Jail) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Ashok Kumar Mina S/o Kishan Lal Mina, R/o Barwal Ki Dhani, Nangal Rajavtan, District Dausa (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Satish Kumar Khandelwal Mr. Atul Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 25/04/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.187/2024 registered at Police Station-Papada, District-Dausa for the offences under Sections [2025:RJ-JP:17634] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2823/2025] 190, 191(2), 191(3), 109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 307 and 324(4) of of BNS, 2023 and Section 3/25 of Arms Act, 1959 (Amended 2019). Since both the bail applications have arisen from common order, hence, they are being decided by this single order. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. Counsel further submits that the petitioners have lodged the FIR before the concerning police station but no serious investigation was carried out by concerning police authorities about the incident. Counsel further submits that the so called injury caused are in simple in nature and not on the vital part of the body. Petitioner-Kamlesh Kumar is behind the bars since 14.02.2025 and petitioner- Mukesh Kumar is behind the bars since 17.03.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Kamlesh Kumar [2025:RJ-JP:17634] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2823/2025] S/o Shri Kaluram and Mukesh Kumar S/o Baluram Meena shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/9-10