ASHOK KUMAR SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. P.W.D. LKO AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/3004/2025 · 2025-04-10
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130786 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130786 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20167-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3004 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Singh And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. P.W.D. Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Srivastava,Dinesh Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Heard.
2. The petitioners allege interference in their Bhumidhari lands in the garb of widening of existing road. Shri Manish Mishra, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State has instructions to inform the Court that the aforesaid work was being undertaken, however, on the objections of the petitioners, the same has been stopped and the revenue authorities have been asked to undertake an exercise for demarcation.
3. Let the Sub Divisional Magistrate concerned undertake an exercise for demarcation of the boundaries of Bhumidhari Gatas of the petitioners and the Gata on which the road exists so that the matter be resolved at the earliest. The aforesaid exercise shall be taken in the presence of the petitioners and other persons as may be affected. Further work would be undertaken only after the demarcation exercise is completed.
4. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is
disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.)
Order Date :- 10.4.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench