Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13077 (GAU)

ON THE DEATH OF RAMANI MOHAN NATH HIS LEGAL HEIR SMTI ANUPAMA NATH AND ORS v. IKRAM HUSSAIN AND ORS

RSA/169/2003 · 2025-02-19

Devashis Baruah

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/6 GAHC010111512003 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : RSA/169/2003 ON THE DEATH OF RAMANI MOHAN NATH HIS LEGAL HEIR SMTI ANUPAMA NATH AND ORS BORDOLOIGURI,MOUZA HINDUGHOPA,PS.SIPAJHAR 2: ON THE DEATH OF APPELANT NO 2. PURAN NATH HIS LEGAL HEIRS REPRESENTED BY- 2.1: SMTI. SAIBA DEVI W/O. LATE PURAN NATH R/O. BORDOLOIGURI MOUZA- HINDUGHOPA P.S. SIPAJHAR DIST. DARRANG 2.2: SHRI BINOD KUMAR NATH S/O. LATE PURAN NATH R/O. BORDOLOIGURI MOUZA- HINDUGHOPA P.S. SIPAJHAR DIST. DARRANG 2.3: SHRI RATUL KUMAR NATH S/O. LATE PURAN NATH R/O. BORDOLOIGURI MOUZA- HINDUGHOPA P.S. SIPAJHAR DIST. DARRANG 2.4: SHRI PARESH KUMAR NATH S/O. LATE PURAN NATH R/O. BORDOLOIGURI MOUZA- HINDUGHOPA P.S. SIPAJHAR DIST. DARRANG Page No.# 2/6 2.5: SMTI MAKONI DEVI W/O. SHRI BIPIN CH. NATH VILL. DAKHOTORI P.O. GORUKHUTI P.S. SIPAJHAR DIST. DARRANG 2.6: SMTI REKHA DEVI D/O. LATE PURAN NATH W/O. SHRI JAYANTA SAHARIA VILL. MATHAJKAR P.O. GORUKHUTI P.S. SIPAJHAR DIST. DARRANG 2.7: SMTI MAMONI DEVI D/O. LATE PURAN NATH W/O. SHRI DHARJYA KUMAR NATH VILL AND P.O. DHEKIPARA P.S. SIPAJHAR DIST. DARRAN VERSUS IKRAM HUSSAIN AND ORS S/O LATE AKHTAR HUSSAIN R/O PAKABANGI, MOUZA HINDHU GHOPA, DISTRICT DARRANG 2:MD MUSTAQ ALI S/O LATE AKHTAR HUSSAIN R/O PAKABANGI MOUZA HINDHU GHOPA DISTRICT DARRANG 3:ON THE DEATH OF SALIMUDDIN AHMED HIS LEGAL HEIRS NAMELY- 3.1:MISS MINA BEGUM W/O LATE SALIMUDDIN AHMED R/O VILL PAKABANGI MOUZA HINDUGHOPA DISTRICT DARRANG 3.2:MISS MUMTAZA BEGUM D/O LATE SALIMUDDIN AHMED Page No.# 3/6 R/O VILL PAKABANGI MOUZA HINDUGHOPA DISTRICT DARRANG 3.3:MISS SABANA AZMI D/O LATE SALIMUDDIN AHMED R/O VILL PAKABANGI MOUZA HINDUGHOPA DISTRICT DARRANG 3.4:MISS NOORIM AHMED D/O LATE SALIMUDDIN AHMED R/O VILL PAKABANGI MOUZA HINDUGHOPA DISTRICT DARRANG 4:ON THE DEATH OF DODHI NATH HIS LEGAL HEIRS REPRESENTED BY- 4.1:SRI PRADIP NATH S/O DODHI NATH RO GORIAPARA MOUZA KOLAIGAON DISTRICT DARRANG 4.2:SRI BHADELA NATH S/O DODHI NATH RO GORIAPARA MOUZA KOLAIGAON DISTRICT DARRANG 4.3:SMTI PHULKAN NATH D/O DODHI NATH RO GORIAPARA MOUZA KOLAIGAON DISTRICT DARRANG 4.4:SMTI GHARKHOWA D/O DODHI NATH RO GORIAPARA MOUZA KOLAIGAON Page No.# 4/6 DISTRICT DARRANG 4.5:SMTI ASTAMI NATH D/O DODHI NATH RO GORIAPARA MOUZA KOLAIGAON DISTRICT DARRANG 5:ON THE DEATH OF BIPIN CHANDRA NATH HIS LEGAL HEIRS REPRESENTED BY 5.1:SRI BHUPEN KUMAR NATH S/O. LATE BIPIN CHANDRA NATH R/O. VILL. SARANDARA GORIAPARA P.O. BURARGARH DIST. DARRANG PIN-784147 5.2:SRI KAMALA KUMAR NATH S/O. LATE BIPIN CHANDRA NATH R/O. VILL. SARANDARA GORIAPARA P.O. BURARGARH DIST. DARRANG PIN-784147 6:SHRI RAJEN NATH S/O LATE MOHI NATH RO GORIAPARA MOUZA KOLAIGAON DISTRICT DARRANG 7:SHRI JYATIN NATH S/O LATE MOHI NATH RO GORIAPARA MOUZA KOLAIGAON DISTRICT DARRANG 8:SHRI PHANI NATH S/O LATE MOHI NATH VILLAGE BORDOULGURI P.S. SIPAJHAR DISTRICT DARRANG Page No.# 5/6 9:STRUCK OFF VIDE ORDER DATED 18.01.2017 PASSED IN I.A.(C) NO. 1430/2016 10:STRUCK OFF VIDE ORDER DATED 28.06.2006 PASSED IN RSA NO. 169.2003 11:SMTI MANESWARI DEVI W/O SHRI NARENDRA NATH VILLAGE PATAGAON DISTRICT DARRANG 12:SMT JAYANTI NATH W/O SHRI BIPIN NATH VILLAGE GORIAPARA DISTRICT DARRANG 13:SMT MOHI NATH W/O LATE MOHI RAM NATH VILLAGE GORIAPARA DISTRCIT DARRANG 14:STRUCK OFF VIDE HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 8/8/2016 PASSED IN I.A.(C) NO. 1430/2016 15:STRUCK OFF VIDE HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 8/8/2016 PASSED IN I.A.(C) NO. 1430/2016 16:STRUCK OFF VIDE HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 8/8/2016 PASSED IN I.A.(C) NO. 1430/201 For the appellant(s) : None appears For the respondent (s) : Mr. B. Chakraborty, Advocate Page No.# 6/6 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R 20.02.2025 None has appeared on behalf of the appellants on call when the matter has been taken up. 2. Mr. B. Chakraborty, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 to 4, 6 & 7. 3. Taking into account that the appellants are not represented and on the earlier occasion also, the appellants had not appeared, it seems that the appellants have lost interest in the instant proceedings for which the instant Appeal stands dismissed. 4. The Registry is directed to return the LCRs. JUDGE Comparing Assistant