MEENA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO AND 4 OTHERS
WPIL/287/2025 · 2025-04-03
Attau Rahman Masoodi, Karunesh Singh Pawar
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130765 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130765 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18530-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 287 of 2025 Petitioner :- Meena Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Singh,Raghvendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
1. Sri Indrajeet Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel on the basis of instructions has stated that the resolution was passed by the gram sabha for construction of the fair price shop on the gaon sabha land and the resolution so passed has duly been approved by the Sub- divisional Magistrate.
2. It is further evident from the instructions placed before us that the site in question has been chosen looking to the convenience of supply, storage and distribution. The government order for establishment of such fair price shops in the village area lays emphasis on locational value i.e. conducive to the supply, storage and distribution. All the three aspects have been taken into account while passing the resolution.
3. The present PIL does not state any facts germane to the cause.
4. Having regard to the instructions made available to us, we see no reason to interfere in exercise of the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
5. The writ petion bereft of any merit is accordingly dismissed. . [Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.] [Attau Rahman Masoodi, J.] Order Date :- 3.4.2025 kanhaiya Digitally signed by :- KANHAIYA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench