Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 130761 (ALL)

MOHAMMAD NAUQI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/1689/2025 · 2025-03-28

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17773 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1689 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohammad Nauqi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manuvendra Singh,Rajneesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private opposite parties is hereby dispensed with. By means of this petition, the petitioner seeks following main relief(s) :- "(i) To, direct the opposite party no.2, Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Ayodhya Divison Ayodhya to decide the delay condonation application of the petitioner preferred with an Appeal No. 2491/2024, (ComputerizedNo. T202404000002491) In;Re: Mohd. Naqui Versus Aqbal Ahmad and Others under section 207 of the U. P. Revenue Code 2006, in compliance of order dated 03-12-2024 passed by Hon'ble Lucknow High Court in Writ -C No. 10233 of 2024 (Iqbal Ahmad Ansari and 4 others Vs. State of UP Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Lucknow and others). (ii) To direct the opposite party no.2, Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Ayodhya Divison Ayodhya to decide the Appeal No. 2491/2024, (Computerized No. T202404000002491) In; Re: Mohd. Naqui Versus Aqbal Ahmad and Others under section 207 of the U. P. Revenue Code 2006, in compliance of order dated 03-12-2024 passed by Hon'ble Lucknow High Court in Writ -C No. 10233 of 2024 (Iqbal Ahmad Ansari and 4 others Vs. State of UP Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Lucknow and others)." Taking note of Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, as per which, revision or appeal should preferably be decided within six months and on account of pendency of the same, the petitioner, as stated, is suffering great hardship and mental agony, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2/Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide the delay condonation application of the petitioner preferred with an Appeal No.2491/2024, (Computerized No.T202404000002491) In; Re: Mohd. Naqui Versus Aqbal Ahmad and Others", expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 28.3.2025 ML/- Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench