CRM-M-2528-2025 1 201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-2528-2025 Date of decision:15.05.2025 SURJEET SINGH ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present: Mr. Rajinder Singh Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Aditi Girdhar, AAG, Haryana. **** AMARJOT BHATTI , J. Petitioner-Surjeet Singh has filed the present petition under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 191, dated 14.11.2024 (Annexure P-1), under Sections 74, 79 and 115 of BNS (Sections 67 and 67-A of Information Technology Act added later on), registered at Police Station Jhansa, District Kurukshetra, Haryana. 2. As per facts of the case, Sukwinder Kaur complainant filed written complaint that she was serving in Health Department, Ludhiana. Surjeet Singh on 22.09.2024 called at her number 94172-61149 from his mobile number i.e. 75918-68773 and indulged in loose talk. He repeated same behaviour by calling her on 04.11.2024. On 12.11.2024, she along with her sister-in-law Raj Kaur, daughter Parabjot Kaur went to Dera Gurmuliya for talking to Surjeet Singh, where he again misbehaved with her and even gave beatings to her. With these allegations, present FIR has been registered. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner argued that as per interim relief MONIKA RANI 2025.05.19 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-2528-2025 2 granted in his favour vide order dated 17.01.2025, he has joined the investigation and fully cooperated. He is still ready to abide by the terms and conditions of bail order. 4. Learned counsel representing State filed status report, confirming the allegations detailed in the FIR. Copy of MLR of Sukhwinder Kaur is Annexure R-1 and opinion of doctor is Annexure R-2. There are recovery memos vide which pen drive and mobile phone marka OPPO colour blue were recovered which are Annexure R-3 and R-4 respectively. Today, on instructions of Inspector Jeet Singh, counsel representing State confirmed that petitioner has handed over the sim card and he is not required for any other purpose. 5. Considering the aforesaid factual position, petitioner has fully cooperated with the investigating agency. Therefore, without expressing my mind on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioner- Surjeet Singh is allowed. He shall not be arrested. In case of his arrest, he be released on bail to the satisfaction of Arresting/ Investigating Officer concerned, subject to condition that petitioner will join the investigation as and when required. He will not tamper with or interfere with investigation and will not leave country without prior permission as provided under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. 6. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly as well. (AMARJOT BHATTI) JUDGE 15.05.2025 monika 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes /No 2. Whether reportable : Yes /No MONIKA RANI 2025.05.19 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document