1 2025:CGHC:14433-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 210 of 2025 1 - M/s A.K. Enterprises Through Proprietor, Mohammad Parvez Alam, Age 46 Years S/o- Abdul Kadir Khan, Resident Of - P.H. No. 14, Khasra No. 6561 (Part), Ward No. 07, Kripal Nagar, Kohka, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - Mohammad Yusuf Khan S/o Abdul Kadir Khan Aged About 52 Years R/o- P.H. No. 14, Khasra No. 7357/5 (Part), Ward No. 8, Farid Nagar, Murum Khadan Road, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Appellants versus 1 - Canara Bank Through Authorized Officer, Prem Kishore Gupta, S/o- Ram Kishore Sah, Aged About 51 Years, Office At- Regional Office, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - District Magistrate Durg District- Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Appellant : Mr. Amit Buxy, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Sunil Pillai, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Govt. Advocate ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2025.03.26 17:50:08 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 26.03 .2025 1 Heard Mr. Amit Buxy, learned counsel for the appellants. Also heard Mr. Sunil Pillai, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 as well as Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondents No.2 and 3. 2 Learned counsel for the appellants submits that instant writ appeal has become infructuous as respondent No.3 i.e. the District Magistrate, Durg, District Durg has already conclude the proceedings under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assests and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and also passed the order in this regard. 3 Learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents have not opposed the submissions advanced on behalf of the appellants. 4 In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellants, the present writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous. However, the appellants are at liberty to take recourse to the law, if occasion arise. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Anu