DR. NARESH KUMAR SAGAR S/O RAM LAL SGAR v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/4372/2025 · 2025-03-27
Anoop Kumar Dhand
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13071 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13071 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:13965] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4372/2025
1. Dr. Naresh Kumar Sagar S/o Ram Lal Sgar, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Jatav Mohalla, Village Bahara Rekh Pura, Post Andhiyari, Tehsil Uchchain, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. Working As Assistant Professor (Political Science) Guest Faculty Under Vidhya Sambal Yojna At Govt. Girls College, Uchchain, District Bharatpur
2. Dr. Dharmendra Kumar Sharma S/o Radha Raman Sharma, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Vpo Sehna, Tehsil Uchchain, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. Working As Assistant Professor (Geography) Guest Faculty Under Vidhya Sambal Yojna At Govt. Girls College, Uchchain, District Bharatpur
3. Dr.upma Singh Parihar D/o Ashok Singh Parihar, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Chaka Thabha, Poat Nara Manjhanpur, Po Sirathu, District Kaushambi, (Up). Working As Assistant Professor (Sanskrit) Guest Faculty Under Vidhya Sambal Yojna At Govt. Girls College, Uchchain, District Bharatpur
4. Dr. Poonam Dixit D/o Omveer Sharma, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Ganesh Nagar, Sewar Road, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. Working As Assistant Professor (English) Guest Faculty Under Vidhya Sambal Yojna At Govt. Girls College, Uchchain, District Bharatpur.
5. Dr. Seema Singh W/o Jitendra Singh Fouzdar, Aged About 51 Years, R/o G H-119 Uit Colony, Sector 6 Bhiwadi Harchandpur, Tijara, District Alwar, Rajasthan. Working As Assistant Professor (Hindi) Guest Faculty Under Vidhya Sambal Yojna At Govt. Girls College, Uchchain, District Bharatpur.
6. Yogendra Kumar S/o Amar Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Nagla Beeja, Roopwas, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. Working As Assistant Professor ((History) Guest Faculty Under Vidhya Sambal Yojna At Govt. Girls College, Rudawal, District Bharatpur. ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Higher
[2025:RJ-JP:13965] (2 of 4) [CW-4372/2025] Education, Secretariat, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Commissioner, College Education, Block 4, Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. The Principal, Rameshwari Devi Girls College District Bharatpur.
4. The Principal, Maharani Shri Jaya Govt. College District Bharatpur.
5. The Principal, Devnarayan Govt. Girls College (Bayana) District Bharatpur
6. The Principal, Govt. Girls College, Uchchain, District Bharatpur.
7. The Principal Govt. Girls College, Rudawal, District Bharatpur
8. The Principal Govt. Girls College, Bayana, District Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aamir Khan JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 27/03/2025
1. The instant petition has been preferred with the following prayer:-
“1. By appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof, the respondents be directed to continue the petitioners as Guest Faculty under the Vidya Sambal Yojna. 2. By appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents be directed not to replace the petitioners with another set of contractual employees in the garb of fresh advertisement year 2025. 3. Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court deems just and proper on the facts and in the circumstances of the case may also be passed
[2025:RJ-JP:13965] (3 of 4) [CW-4372/2025] in favour of the Petitioners with cost of the petition.”
2. By way of filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made to continue the services of the petitioners as guest faculty under the Vidhya Sambal Yojna and not to replace them with another set of contractual employees in pursuance of the advertisement issued in the year 2025. 3. During the course of arguments, it is apprised to this Court that a similar controversy as involved in this petition, came before this Court in the case of “Ram Chaturvedi & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.” (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1474/2023) and the said controversy has been set at rest with the following directions:-
“(i) Respondents while engaging the Guest Faculty in
the
session
2023-24
in
various colleges/universities under the Raj-CES under Vidya Sambal Scheme, shall give preference to engage the petitioners who have already rendered services as Guest Faculty in this scheme in the previous sessions/years, at previous place of posting or nearby place obviously subject to availability of vacancies in the previous college/university or nearby place as well as after considering the satisfactory services of petitioners. (ii) Petitioners who have been engaged as Guest Faculty in the previous sessions shall not be dislodged/replaced from its previous place with fresh appointment of Guest Faculty, subject to availability of vacant post and need of engagement. (iii) After re-engagement/adjustment of the petitioners i.e. previous Guest Faculty in the Vidya Sambal Scheme, against vacancies for the year 2023-24, the remaining vacant posts of previous years, and on the new vacancies accrued in session 2023-24 may be filled by the fresh aspirants in accordance with the criteria of selection prescribed in the scheme.
[2025:RJ-JP:13965] (4 of 4) [CW-4372/2025] (iv) It is made clear that petitioners who were already engaged in the previous sessions and are willing for appointment/engagement in the present session 2023-24 in the Vidya Sambal Scheme, are required to apply afresh pursuant to advertisement issued by respondents and his/her re-engagement in the Vidya Sambal Scheme for session 2023-24 would be governed by terms and conditions of the scheme and shall not create any additional equity/claim which is not available in the scheme.”
4. In the aforesaid case of Ram Chaturvedi (supra), the Coordinate Bench of this Court issued direction to the respondents to give preference to engage the co-petitioners, who have already rendered services as Guest Faculty in this scheme in the previous sessions/years. 5. Since the controversy involved in this petition has already been set at rest in the case of Ram Chaturvedi (supra), this Court finds no valid reason to take different view. 6. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, strictly in accordance with the directions issued in the case of Ram Chaturvedi (Supra). 7. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/26