Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18270 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1780 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ramrati Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner (Administration) Lko. Division, Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Pandey,Rakesh Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner says that some necessary parties are left to be impleaded in this petition, as such, he may be permitted to implead the same during the course of the day. The prayer aforesaid is acceded, as the same has not been opposed. In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to implead the aforesaid parties in the memo of this petition during the course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State counsel. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "I. Direct to the opposite party No. 1 i.e. Additional Commissioner (Administration), Lucknow Division, Lucknow to decide the Revision No. C- 20161000001517 (Ram Sagar (@ Sagar Versus Nayab Tehsildar and others) under section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 filed by the Ram Sagar @ Sagar pending before him since 10.08.2016, within the stipulated time as Hon'ble Court deem just and proper." Taking note of Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, as per which, revision or appeal should preferably be decided preferably within six months, however, in the instant case, the revision is pending since 2016 and on account of pendency of the same, the petitioner, as stated, is suffering great hardship and mental agony, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1/Additional Commissioner (Administration), Lucknow Division, Lucknow to consider and decide the Revision No. C-20161000001517 (Ram Sagar (@ Sagar Versus Nayab Tehsildar and others) most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 2.4.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench