Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18312 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3384 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Prakash Kureel Respondent :- The State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Samaj Kalyan Vibhag And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjai Kumar Singh,Nilay Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. Uday Veer Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the opposite party Nos.1, 2, 3 & 4. 2. In view of the propose order, the notice to opposite party No.5 is hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "(a) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay the arrears of regular salary to the petitioner as per the law as the similarly situated persons are getting for the period for which the petitioner has worked but he has not been paid salary along with the 24 percent interest per year." 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of his grievance the petitioner has preferred various representations to the authorities concerned, some of them have been annexed as Annexure Nos.15 to 18 to the writ petition, but no appropriate decision has been taken on the same till date. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2 i.e. the Director, Samaj Kalyan Vibhag, U.P., Lucknow and the direction may be issued him to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner with expedition. 6. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. 7. In view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, the instant writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage permitting the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2 i.e. the Director, Samaj Kalyan Vibhag, U.P., Lucknow taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him for disposal of the representation annexing therewith copy of his earlier representation, if any, and the relevant documents in support of his claim within a period of fifteen days from today, and if any such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order, with expedition, preferably within a period of ten weeks from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order along with representation and the decision thereof be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 8. In view of the aforesaid terms, the instant writ petition is disposed of finally. . [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 2.4.2025 Suresh/ Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench