Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 130666 (ALL)

KRIPA SHANKAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/2539/2025 · 2025-04-08

Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, Vivek Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19699-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2539 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kripa Shankar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vikas Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Rahul Singh Rana,Shambhu Prasad Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 16.3.2025, bearing F.I.R./Case Crime No.0127 of 2025, for the offence under Sections 318(2), 316(2), 338, 336(3) & 340(2) of B.N.S., 2023, registered at Police Station Krishana Nagar, District Lucknow. 3. In Para-15 of the writ petition, petitioner has stated that he has criminal history of only one case against him i.e. Case Crime No.210 of 2021, under Sections 406, 420 IPC, Police Station-Krishana Nagar, District Lucknow. 4. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of written instructions, informs that other than the aforesaid case, there is criminal history of six cases against the petitioner, starting from the year 2019 to 2022. The same has been concealed by the petitioner while filing present writ petition. 5. This Court, in the given facts and circumstances of the case, is not inclined to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction, as there is a false statement made by the petitioner in the writ petition. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. . [Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 8.4.2025 Sachin Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench