Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 130665 (ALL)

AJAY KUMAR RASTOGI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/2986/2025 · 2025-04-09

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19964-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2986 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Rastogi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sourabh Rastogi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard. 2. Petitioner has not annexed relevant documents such as plaint, compromise nor the Khataunis which would have helped us to ascertain as to what are the rights, if any, claimed by the petitioner in respect of Gata No.1938 whereas learned Standing Counsel has written instructions that the said Gata is recorded in the name of Adhyaksh Rajasva Karamchari Sangh. He is in possession of Khatauni in respect thereof. It is said that a declaratory suit in respect of the land in question has been decreed in favour of the petitioner. The decree-Annexure no.2 does not disclose any details of the land. The Khatauni is taken on record. 3. These are not the matters to be interfered under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the absence of requisite pleadings and documentary proof. Petitioner may avail other remedies including approaching the higher authorities be it District Magistrate or Superintendent of Police, as the case may be, or before the court concerned. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 9.4.2025 Shanu/- Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench