ABHILASH KUMAR SINGH AND 10 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF COOPERATIVE LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIA/3339/2025 · 2025-03-27
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130647 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130647 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17577 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3339 of 2025 Petitioner :- Abhilash Kumar Singh And 10 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Cooperative Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vinod Kumar Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1.Heard Sri Raj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1 and Sri Akber Ahmad, learned counsel, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the respondents No.2 to 7, the same is taken on record.
2. There is consensus at Bar that the the matter in issue is squarely covered by the order dated 06.12.2024 passed in Writ A No.7820 of 2024 In re Kamal Krishna Mishra vs State of U.P. & 3 Ors, a copy of which is Annexure-8 to the writ petition. It is further contended that a special appeal filed against the said judgment vide Special Appeal No.09 of 2025 In Re U.P. Sahkari Gram Vikas Bank Ltd Lucknow & 2 Ors vs. Kamal Krishna Mishra & Anr. has been dismissed in limine vide judgment and order dated 10.01.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-9 to the writ petition. Thus, the judgment of this Court in the case of Kamal Krishna Mishra (supra) has attained finality.
3. Considering the aforesaid consensus, the writ petition is allowed. It is provided that the petitioners are also entitled to the benefit of the judgment in the case of Kamal Krishna Mishra (supra) and the order impugned dated 02.07.2024 is quashed in so far as it pertains to the present petitioners.
4. It has been pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioners that salary for the various months has not been paid to the petitioners.
5. In view thereof, the respondents are directed to pay outstanding salary to the petitioners without any deduction and continue to pay salary month to month in accordance with law under relevant rules, provided there is no legal impediment. . [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 27.3.2025 Suresh/ Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench