Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13064 (CHH)

RAMJEE CHATURVEDEE v. SIDDHARTH KOMAL PARDESHI

CONT/332/2025 · 2025-08-13

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 332 of 2025 1 - Ramjee Chaturvedee S/o Punau Ram Chaturvedee Aged About 46 Years Presently Working As Head Master (Primary School) At Govt. Primary School, Udgan, Block Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 2 - Sadhram Markam S/o Shyam Lal Markam Aged About 48 Years Presently Working As Head Master (Primary School) At Govt. Janpad Primary School, Bilha, Block Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 3 - Anita Kaushik W/o Rajesh Kumar Kaushik, Aged About 44 Years Presently Working As Head Master (Primary School) At Govt. Janpad Girls Primary School, Bilha, Block Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Siddharth Komal Pardeshi Presently Posted As Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Basavraju S. Presently Posted As Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Miss Divya Umesh Mishra, Presently Posted As Director, Directorate Of Of Public Instructions, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Rimijiyus Ekka, Presently Posted As Commissioner Cum Director, Directorate Of Urban Administration And Development, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Praveen Singh Gahlot, Presently Posted As Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.08.14 17:31:02 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rupendra Dewangan, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vinay Pandey & Mr. Aniket Verma, Advocate for the respective respondents Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 14/08/2025 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the grievance of the petitioners has been redressed and the representation has been decided and now, the petitioners do not want to press the present contempt petition further. 2. On the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present contempt petitioner is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika