Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 130577 (ALL)

RAM KARAN SINGH v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER (ADMINSTRATION), AYODHYA MANDAL, AYODHYA AND 4 OTHERS

A227/1686/2025 · 2025-03-27

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17480 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1686 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Karan Singh Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner (Adminstration), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailendra Pratap Singh,Adarsh Mahendra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner says that some necessary parties are left to be impleaded in this petition, as such, he may be permitted to implead the same during the course of the day. The prayer aforesaid is acceded, as the same has not been opposed. In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the aforesaid parties in the memo of this petition during the course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anurag Kumar Maurya, learned State counsel. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "i. Issue an order or direction, directing the opposite party no.1 to expedite the hearing of Computerized Case No.C202404000000662, Case No.662/2024 "Ratipal Singh and others Vs. Khushi Mohammad and others" Under section 38 (4) of U.P. Revenue Code 2006 which is pending since 11-03-2024 before the Opposite party no.1., in the interest of justice." Taking note of Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, as per which, revision or appeal should be decided preferably within six months, however, in the instant case, the appeal is pending since March, 2024 and on account of pendency of the same, the petitioner, as stated, who is aged about 56 years, is suffering great hardship and mental agony, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping this petition pending. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1/Additional Commissioner (Adminstration), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya to consider and decide the Appeal No. 662/2024, Computerized Case No.C202404000000662 (Ratipal Singh and others Vs. Khushi Mohammad and others) most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 27.3.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench