APHC010156492023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2142/2023 Between: 1. VEERAMALLU ARUNA VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O. VEERAMALLU MURALI MOHAN, AGED 22 YRS., OCCU UNEMPLOYEE, R/O H.NO. 7-2, SC COLONY, PEDATADEPALLI, TADEPALLIGUNDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. DR SUJOY LAL THAOSEN, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED MAJOR, THE DIRECTORARE GENERAL, CRPF (RECRUITMENT BRANCH), EAST BLOCK-7, LEVEL-4, SECTOR-1, RK PURAM, NEW DELHI. 2. SHRI M DINAKARAN, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED MAJOR, THE REGIONAL RECRUITMENT CENTER, GROUP CENTER, CRPF AVADI, CHENNAI. 3. SH ANIL MINZ, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED MAJOR, THE GROUP CENTER, C.R.P.C.F., RANGAREDDY REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, HAKIMPET, SECUNDERABAD. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue a notice of Contempt to the Respondents herein and punish them for their derogative and intentional failure to comply with the judgment and orders of this Honorable Court passed in W.P. No. 3537 of 2021 dated 27-04-2022 in accordance with law, and consequently also direct the respondents to comply with the said order of this Honorable Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MAMIDI SAI YADAV Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. ARUN SHOWRI G The Court made the following order: On 25.04.2025 and 04.07.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. In spite of listing the matter under the caption of ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner today also88. It shows that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. 2. Therefore, the contempt case is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BRS