Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13055 (UTT)

SAHIL MONY v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1290/2024 · 2025-05-20

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1290 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Piyush Sammal, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned AGA for the State. 3. Mr. Amit Kapri, learned counsel for respondent no.3. 4. Learned counsel for the State submits that after investigation, the charge-sheet has been submitted on 03.01.2025 against the petitioner. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he would challenge the charge- sheet in the appropriate proceedings before this Court. 6. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. 7. However, it is open to the petitioner to challenge the charge-sheet in appropriate proceedings, before the appropriate forum. 8. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly. (Pankaj Purohit J.) 20.05.2025 Ravi