[2025:RJ-JP:23269] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4215/2025 1. Nisaid S/o Heera, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Gram Kawan Ka Vas, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). 2. Vaseem S/o Israeel, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Gram Bhaudaki, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). 3. Aashik S/o Pappu, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Gram Jenghpuri, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg). 4. Akwar @ Ibbar S/o Pappu, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Gram Jenghpuri Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.) Order 16/06/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with FIR No.55/2025 registered at Police Station Khoh, District Deeg for the offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 308(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)(a), 313 & 303(2) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amended) Act, 2008. [2025:RJ-JP:23269] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4215/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they are in custody since 11.03.2025. Learned counsel further submits that the Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. Learned counsel also submit that no other criminal case is pending against the accused- petitioners. Therefore, they may be released on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. 6. Having regard the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioners so also the fact that the Police after completion of investigation has already submitted charge-sheet in the matter and no other criminal case is pending against the accused-petitioners, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 7. Accordingly, the application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners named above shall be released on bail provided, each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only)(each), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is [2025:RJ-JP:23269] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4215/2025] transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. It has been brought to the notice of this Court that the accused-persons of particular areas, who are involved in the cases of online fraud, after their release from such a criminal case, often celebrate their release in public. Hence, taking into consideration the aforesaid aspect, a condition is imposed that the accused- petitioners shall not celebrate their release in public and if they are found to be involved in celebrating their release in public, the State shall be at liberty to move the application for cancellation of bail. (GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.)),J Ashish Kumar /73