S.No. 82 Supplementary List IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 1756/2025 CM(4586/2025) KHAZIR MOHAMMAD DAR …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr.Parvaiz Lone & Iqra. K. Mir, Advocates Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (REVENUE) AND ORS ...Respondent(s) Through: CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL,JUDGE ORDER 25-07-2025 1. The present petition involves disputed questions of fact, and the appropriate remedy lies elsewhere. However, the petitioner, instead of approaching the competent authority, has chosen to file the present petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after addressing the arguments, seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the competent authority. 3. Permission, as prayed for, is granted. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the competent authority. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 25-07-2025 Mubashir