Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13053 (UTT)

ANUP KUMAR CHAUDHAY v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/2275/2024 · 2025-01-09

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No.2275 of 2024 Anup Kumar Chaudhary ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. S.R.S. Gill, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Pramod Tiwari, Brief Holder for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No. 585 of 2020, under Sections 420, 120B IPC and Section 3 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) act, 2005, Police Station Kotwali Gangnahar, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. It is argued that the co-accused having similar role has already been granted bail. 4. This fact is admitted by learned State counsel. 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 6. The bail application is allowed. 2 7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 09.01.2025 Jitendra