SMT. RANJEETA MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BAL VIKAS SEWA EVM PUSHTAHAAR LKO AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/3312/2025 · 2025-03-27
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130519 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130519 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17478 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3312 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Ranjeeta Maurya Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Bal Vikas Sewa Evm Pushtahaar Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Julfikar Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing counsel for respondent no. 1 to 4. By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the writ of mandamus directing opposite parties to take necessary action regarding the grievance raised by the petitioner in her application, contained in Annexure No. 1 to the petition. Learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of the written instructions, submits that the petitioner's case has already been considered and rejected on the grounds that, according to the high school certificate, the petitioner's date of birth is 25.09.1986 and as on cut off date, she had exceeded the age limit of 35 years. The instructions provided by the learned Standing Counsel are taken on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, submits that he wants to challenge the rejection order. Learned Standing Counsel undertakes to provide the rejection
order to learned counsel for the petitioner during course of the day. In view of the above discussions, the petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition assailing the rejection order.
Order Date :- 27.3.2025/R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench