Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13051 (GAU)

PROF GURU PRASAD KHATANIAR v. THE GAUHATI UNIVERSITY AND 4 ORS.

I.A.(Civil)/1669/2025 · 2025-09-02

Nelson Sailo

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010111312025 2025:GAU-AS:11886 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1669/2025 PROF GURU PRASAD KHATANIAR S/O LATE RAJANI KANTA KHATANIAR, R/O HOUSE NO. 11 (BRAHVISH), BONBONONI PATH, BONGAON, BELTOLA, GUWHAATI-781028 VERSUS THE GAUHATI UNIVERSITY AND 4 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR, GOPINATH BORDOLOI NAGAR, JALUKBARI, GUWAHATI-781014, DIST- KAMRUP (M) 2:THE REGISTRAR GAUHATI UNIVERSITYGUWAHATI-781014 DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 3:THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL OF THE GAUHATI UNIVERSITY CUM DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY THE VICE-CHANCELLOR GAUHATI UNIVERSITY GUWAHATI-781014 DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 4:THE INQUIRY OFFICER PERTAINING TO THE DEPARTMENTAL PROCEEDING DRAWN AGAINST THE PETITIONER 5:THE PRESENTING OFFICER PERTAINING TO THE DEPARTMENTAL PROCEEDING DRAWN AGAINST THE PETITIONE Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M K CHOUDHURY, MR. M SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, G U, BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO O R D E R 03.09.2025 Heard Mr. M. Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that by filing this application, the applicant seeks amendment/rectification of the arrayed respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in the writ petition as follows:- (2) The Registrar, Gauhati University, Guwahati, 781014, District-Kamrup (Metro), Assam, (3) The Executive Council of the Gauhati University-cum- Disciplinary Authority, represented by the Vice-Chancellor, Gauhati University, Guwahati, 781014, District-Kamrup (Metro), Assam. 2. Mr. P.J. Phukan, learned Standing Counsel, Gauhati University appearing for the respondents submits that he has no objection if the application is allowed as prayed for. 3. In view of above, the application for amendment/ rectification of the nomenclature of the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 as abstracted herein above and as prayed for by the applicant is hereby allowed. 4. Interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant