Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 130501 (ALL)

RAM LAKAHN VERMA @ RAM LAKHAN v. SMT. NEHA AWASTHI, CHAIRMAN, NAGAR PALIKA PARISAD, SITAPUR AND ANOTHER

CAPL/886/2025 · 2025-07-15

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40405 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 886 of 2025 Applicant :- Ram Lakahn Verma @ Ram Lakhan Opposite Party :- Smt. Neha Awasthi, Chairman, Nagar Palika Parisad, Sitapur And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- Satish Chandra Kashish Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J. 1. Case called out. No one has appeared for the applicant. 2. Sri Satish Chdnara "Kashish", Advocate, learned counsel for respondent is present. 3. The present contempt application is filed with the following prayer : "This Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue the contempt notice against the opposite partiesfor committing the willful disobedience/defiance of the order dated 05.12.2024 passed by this Hon'ble Court in Writ-A No.11654 of 2024 (Ram Lakhan Verma @ Ram Lakhan Vs. State of U.P. and others, in the interest of justice." 4. Sri Satish Chdnara "Kashish", learned counsel appearing for respondents filed affidavit of compliance duly signed by Sri Vaibhav Tripathi, Executive Officer Class-I, Nagar Palika Parishad, Sitapur, which is taken on record. He submits that pursuant to the order of the writ Court, all the due amount has already been paid to the applicant and the details of amount credited in the account of applicant are mentioned in para 6 of the affidavit of compliance. The order dated 11.07.2025 passed by respondent no.2 has been annexed along with the affidavit of compliance as Annexure CA-1. He further submitted that the order of the writ court has been complied with. 5. Considering the contents of the order of writ Court as well as the order passed by the respondent authority dated 11.07.2025, this Court is of the view that since pursuant to the direction issued by this Court the order has been passed by respondent no.2 and all the amount with regard to post retiral dues has already been paid to the applicant, the order of writ court has been complied with therefore, the present contempt application has lost its efficacy. 6. Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed. Order Date :- 15.7.2025. Rks. Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench