Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:29414-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 148 of 2025 1 - Fehmida Hamid Czar W/o Hamid Czar Aged About 83 Years R/o - E- 11, Ward No. 28, Behind Shiv Mandir, Near Kailash Kant Clinic, Village- Avanti Vihar, Post- Shankar Nagar Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Ejaz Czar S/o Hamid Czar Aged About 51 Years R/o- E-11, Ward No.- 28, Behind Shiv Mandir, Near Kailash Kant Clinic, Village Avanti Vihar, Post - Shankar Nagar Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home/police, Mahanadi, Mantralaya, Police Station - Rakhi, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Superintendent Of Police Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Station House Officer Police Station - Telibandha Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2025.07.01 17:24:31 +0530
2 4 - Smt. Tabish Czar W/o Ejaz Czar Aged About 45 Years R/o - Umezar, Turabi, Sugra Asgar Manjil, Near Bohra Masjid, Infront Of Hakimi Apartment, Daudpura Burhanpur (M.P.) Alternate R/o- 3105, 198 Aqurish Newsh, Chenquver, B.C. V-6 Z-2 Ya, Canada.
... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Ali Afzaal Mirza, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Shri Shashank Thakur, Dy. Advocate General For Respondent No. 4 : Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Senior Advocate with Shri Kashif Shakeel, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha,
Chief Justice
Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru,
Judge
Order
on Board
Per
Ramesh Sinha
, Chief Justice
01.07.2025
1. Heard Shri Ali Afzaal Mirza, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri Shashank Thakur, Dy. Advocate General for the State and Rajeev Shrivastava, Senior Advocate with Shri Kashif Shakeel,
learned counsel for the respondent no. 4.
2. The present WPCR has been filed with the following prayer:- 10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire record concerning the case of the petitioners from the possession of the respondent authorities for its kind perusal.
3 10.2 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the FIR bearing Crime No. 99/2025, dated 17.02.2025 registered at Police Station- Telibandha, District Raipur (C.G.) against the petitioners for the offence punishable U/s 420,409, 34 of IPC (Annexure P/1) and consequently, for quashment of the entire criminal proceedings if any arising therefrom. 10.3 Any other relief or relief(s) which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit or proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the present case the interim order has been passed in favour of the petitioner no. 1 by this Court vide order dated 17.03.2025, so far as petitioner no. 2 is concerned he was arrested and he has been allowed bail by the competent Court. He further submits that in the present case after due investigation the charge sheet has been submitted.
4. Learned counsel would submit that since challenge in this petition is to the FIR and as such he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with the liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to challenge the charge sheet.
5. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Amardeep/Shoaib