JANAK KUMAR SINGH AND ORS. v. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, MAHMUDABAD, SITAPUR AND 5 OTHERS
A227/1694/2025 · 2025-03-28
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130462 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130462 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17810
Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1694 of 2025 Petitioner :- Janak Kumar Singh And Ors. Respondent :- Sub Divisional Magistrate, Mahmudabad, Sitapur And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Pandey,Krishna Dutt Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private- respondents is hereby dispensed with. By means of this petition, the petitioner seeks following main relief(s) :-
"I.Wherefore it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble high court may kindly pleased to direct the opposite party no.1 to decide the stay Application pending along with Appeal preferred U/S 207 of UP Revenue Code bearing No 1869 Computerized case no. T-202510640601869 of 2025 Vimla Devi & ors versus Munni Devi & ors contained as Annexure No.1 to this petition. II. It is further prayed that operation, implementation and effect of the
order dated 22.02.2025 passed by the opposite party no.2 be stayed till pendency of the instant petition." Taking note of Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, as per which, revision or appeal should preferably be decided within six months and on account of pendency of the same, the petitioner, as stated, is suffering great hardship and mental agony, this petition is
disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1/Sub Divisional Magistrate, Mahmudabad, District Sitapur bearing Case/Appeal No.1869 (Computerized Case No.T-202510640601869 of 2025) (Vimla Devi & Ors. versus Munni Devi & Ors.), expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 28.3.2025 ML/- Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench