IN TH 102 Dr. Rajesh Sh. Vinee Education another CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU proceeding the order d Bench of Sharma an has been petitioners continue in however, su necessary c COCP-2477-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.2477 o Date of decision ajesh Saini Versus Vineet Garg, IAS, Additional C cation, Department of Higher E AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Birla, Adv Mr. Dalbir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petiti eedings be initiated against the respon rder dated 12.10.2015 (Annexure P h of this Court in CWP-18793-20 ma and another vs. State of Haryana been submitted by the learned S ners were working as “Extensio ue in the same capacity till regula er, subject to their good work, condu Learned counsel for the resp ssary compliance has been made, wh 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 2477 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-01.08.2025 …..Petitioner nal Chief Secretary, Higher er Education, Haryana and …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA la, Advocate for AAG, Haryana. petitioner submits that contempt respondent(s) for not complying ure P-1) passed by a co-ordinate 2015 titled as “Ms. Sonam ryana and others”, vide which it ned State counsel that “…the nsion Lecturers” who would gular appointments are made, onduct and existence of work.” e respondent-State submits that de, while passing an order dated VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.02 12.54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 10.7.2025 present pet produced b record. Cop Registry to book. dated 12.1 complied w Lecturer/A and 2 vide passed in th August 01 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-2477-2025 (O & M) .2025 by the respondent-authority. Thu nt petition. Copy of the aforesaid Orde uced by the learned counsel for the re . Copy thereof is supplied to learned stry to tag/paginate the same at appr Learned counsel for the petiti 12.10.2015 (Annexure P-1) passed lied with and the petitioner has bee urer/Assistant Professor in the Colleg vide order dated 10.7.2025. In view of the above, no furth ed in the present petition, the same is Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, 1, 2025 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 hus, no cause survives in the rder/Memo dated 10.7.2025 the respondent-State is taken on ned counsel for the petitioner. t appropriate place in the paper- e petitioner admits that the order passed by this Court has been as been granted the extension as College under respondents No.1 further orders are required to be e is disposed of accordingly. if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.02 12.54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document