Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 130423 (ALL)

PRIYANKA AGARWAL THRU. HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR. SATYA BHUSHAN AGARWAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOUSING AND URBAN PLANNING DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

A227/1700/2025 · 2025-04-08

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19555 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1700 of 2025 Petitioner :- Priyanka Agarwal Thru. Her Power Of Attorney Holder Mr. Satya Bhushan Agarwal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Housing And Urban Planning Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Harish Pandey,Sagun Chandra Rastogi,Vijay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Singh,Shobhit Mohan Shukla Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today in Court is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; Shri Shobhit Mohan Shukla, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and Shri Prashant Chandra, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.3. 3. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging that despite an order being passed on the complaint filed by the petitioner, the same is not being complied with and the execution proceedings are pending, and the respondents are not appearing. 4. Considering the fact that the orders have been passed by the authority sitting at Noida, the execution is also pending there and the petitioner is residing at Ghaziabad, merely because the Chairman of the RERA Authority sits at Lucknow, no part of cause of action arise at Lucknow warranting interference. 5. In view thereof, present petition is disposed off giving liberty to the petitioner to approach Allahabad High Court for the same relief. Order Date :- 8.4.2025 nishant Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench