1 APHC010156392020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9672/2020 Between: 1. P. ADHI NARAYANA,, S/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC. LABOUR, R/O H. NO. 4-19, S.C. COLONY, LUTTAPETA (VILLAGE), KONCHADAPANCHYAT, PONDURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT A.P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT,SRIKAKULAM. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PONDURU POLICE STATION, PONDURU, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. MR D VIJAYA KUMAR, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, SUB- INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PONDURU POLICE STATION, PONDURU, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ Order or orders, or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the impugned action of the respondents herein in trying to dispossess me from schedule 2 House bearing No. 4-19, land admeasuring 0.5 cents, in Sy. No. 11/8, situated at S.C. Colony, Luttapeta (Village), KonchadaPanchyat, Ponduru Mandal, Srikakulam District without following the due process of Law is highly illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art. 14, 21 and 300 (A) of Constitution of India and violation of Principles of Natural Justice, and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere by dispossess the petitioner from house property bearing H. No. 4-19, land admeasuring 0.5 cents, in Sy. No. 11/8, situated at S.C. Colony, Luttapeta (Village), KonchadaPanchyat, Ponduru Mandal, Srikakulam District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant Stay of dispossession of the petitioner from schedule property House bearing No. 4-19, land admeasuring 0.5 cents, in Sy. No. 11/8, situated at S.C. Colony, Luttapeta (Village), KonchadaPanchyat, Ponduru Mandal, Srikakulam District including calling the petitioner to the police station in pursuance of schedule property and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to taken up the matter for hearing urgent motion list, as the respondents are trying to dispossess the petitioner by encroaching in to the property on 31.05.2020 and threatened to dispossess me as such they may execute at point of time and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TOTA TEJESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9672/2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an appropriate Writ Order or orders, or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the impugned action of the respondents herein in trying to dispossess me from schedule House bearing No. 4-19, land admeasuring 0.5 cents, in Sy. No. 11/8, situated at S.C. Colony, Luttapeta (Village), KonchadaPanchyat, Ponduru Mandal, Srikakulam District without following the due process of Law is highly illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art. 14, 21 and 300 (A) of Constitution of India and violation of Principles of Natural Justice, and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere by dispossess the petitioner from house property bearing H. No. 4-19, land admeasuring 0.5 cents, in Sy. No. 11/8, situated at S.C. Colony, Luttapeta (Village), KonchadaPanchyat, Ponduru Mandal, Srikakulam District and pass…” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the respondent- police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent. 3. None represented for the petitioner. 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to recourse his remedies before the appropriate forum. No order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.08.2025 UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.9672 of 2020 Dated.05.08.2025 UPS 176 5