RAJIT RAM AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/3143/2025 · 2025-04-22
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130413 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130413 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22599 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3143 of 2025 Applicant :- Rajit Ram And 5 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Deepak Kumar Pandey,Paritosh Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri Deepak Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P. while Sri Raj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party no. 2 and filed vakalatnama. The same is taken on record. 2. This petition has been filed by the petitioners for quashing the impugned summoning order dated 5.7.2017 along with other consequential proceedings currently pending before learned Sessions Judge, Balrampur in complaint case No.1086/2016 (now Sessions Trial No.193/2023) titled as
"Sunil Kumar Vs. Inder and others" under Sections 452, 323, 504, 506, 380, 308 IPC relating to police station Tulsipur, District Balrampur. 3. Learned counsel for the parties submit that parties have amicably settled their dispute by way of a compromise deed dated 9.1.2025 which has been annexed as Annexure No.3 to this petition, therefore, the aforesaid case may be decided in terms of the compromise between the parties. 4. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Court below, as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court below. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the Court and the compromise will be made part of the record. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the parties to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 6. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants/petitioners in the aforesaid case. 7.
Original copy of compromise, if filed before this Court along with the present application, be returned to the learned counsel for applicants, as per Rules of Court. 8. With aforesaid directions, the application stands disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 22.4.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench