M/S SITARAM SERVICING AND ENGINEERING WORKS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR DIGAMBAR PRASAD v. STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES
WPC/5156/2025 · 2025-09-16
Rajesh Kumar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13041 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13041 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:28340 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No.5156 of 2025
M/s Sitaram Servicing and Engineering Works (formerly known as M/s Sitaram Servicing Center) having its Office at AIA Tupudana, Hatiya, P.O Hatiya, P.S Tupudana Ranchi, Jharkhand-834003 through its Propreitor Digambar Prasad,S/O Sitaram Sahu, Aged 57 Years Resident of 2D Chitra Apartment Road No 15, Patel Nagar Hatia, P.O Hatia, P.S Jagarnathpur District Ranchi. …… Petitioner Versus
1. State of Jharkhand through the Secretary,
Department of Industries having its Office at Project Building, P.O Dhurwa, P.S, Dhurwa, District, Ranchi.
2. Jharkhand Industrial Area Development Authority, Ranchi Region, Namkum Industrial Area, through its Regional Director, having its office at Lowadih, Samlong, Namkum, P.O. & P.S. Namkum, District:- Ranchi through its Managing Director.
3. Regional Director, Ranchi Industrial Area
Development Authority, Namkum Industrial Area, Lowadih, Samlong, Namkum, P.O. & P.S. Namku, District:- Ranchi. …... Respondents ---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Pandey, Advocate For the Resp.-State : Ms. Sweta Shukla, A.C to A.A.G-II For the Resp.-JIADA : Mr. C. G. A. Bardhan, Advocate ---------
02/Dated: 16
th September, 2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs :-
“(a) For quashing and setting aside the Memo No 236 dated 20.03.2025 (Annexure-9) issued by the Respondent No-3 whereby said Respondent intimated that re demarcation of land allotted to the Petitioner has been done and that too without any intimation to the Petitioner and the said action of the concerned Respondent is in complete violation of principles of natural justice and said order dated 20.03.2025 has been passed without affording any - 1 - W.P.(C) No.5156 of 2025
2025:JHHC:28340 opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner. Moreover, the said letter is bereft of any details as to when the joint team had inspected the said land and demarcation was done and in whose presence. (b) For a direction on the Respondent No -2 and 3 not to disturb the actual physical possession of the land allotted to the Petitioner measuring 10000/- Sqft Land in Tupudana Industrial Area vide Memo No 1096/Ranchi dated 11.04.1990, under the signature of the then Managing Director of Ranchi Industrial Area Development Authority, for the purpose of operating Automobile Garage on Lease for 99 Years on payment of Salami of Rs 23,485. The Possession of the said area was given to the Petitioner on 16.05.1990 the measurement of land as per Possession Letter is (133 Sqft X 75 Sqft Land).
3. The description of land has been given in the allotment letter which is contained in Annexure – 2 to the present writ petition.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly submitted that he wants to remain within the boundary of the allotted land. The allegation of encroachment over the other piece of land has been denied.
5. In view of the above fact, the present writ petition is hereby, disposed of directing the concerned Circle Officer i.e. the Circle Officer, Namkum, Ranchi, to get the land measured in presence of both the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to correct himself as per the measurement with reference to the allotment letter.
6. With above observation and direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
7. Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands
disposed of.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 16th September, 2025 Ravi-Chandan/- - 2 - W.P.(C) No.5156 of 2025